PropWatch.India

RERA, consumer forum or NCLT — where to file when a builder defaults

Three legal forums hear home buyer complaints — RERA, the consumer commission, and NCLT under the Insolvency Code. Each has different jurisdiction, timelines and remedies. Here is how to choose.

PropWatch Editorial9 min read

When a builder has missed a possession date, refused a refund, or stopped responding entirely, an Indian home buyer has three principal forums available. Each was designed with a different problem in mind, each has its own jurisdictional rules, and each delivers a different kind of relief. Filing in the wrong forum can cost months of time and the right to file in the correct one.

The Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)

The state RERA is the first stop for most buyers. It handles complaints about RERA-registered projects — possession delays, deviation from sanctioned plans, false advertising, refund and interest disputes. The Authority can order refunds with interest at the prescribed rate (MCLR plus two percent in most states), direct project completion, or impose penalties on the promoter.

  • Forum: state RERA, then state Real Estate Appellate Tribunal on appeal
  • Typical timeline: 60 days for disposal under the Act (often longer in practice)
  • Remedy: refund with interest, possession direction, penalty
  • Best for: RERA-registered projects where the buyer wants a specific remedy

The Consumer Commission (District, State, NCDRC)

Home buyers are 'consumers' of a service under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. The consumer commission can award refunds, compensation for mental harassment, and litigation costs. Jurisdiction is by value: up to one crore — district commission; one to ten crore — state commission; above ten crore — National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC).

  • Forum: district, state, or NCDRC by claim value
  • Typical timeline: longer than RERA in practice — often two to four years
  • Remedy: refund, compensation, litigation costs, sometimes punitive damages
  • Best for: cases where compensation beyond refund is sought, or where the project is not RERA-registered

NCLT under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code

After the 2018 amendment, home buyers count as financial creditors and can collectively initiate insolvency proceedings against a defaulting builder. A minimum of one hundred allottees, or ten percent of the total allottees in the project, must join the petition. This is the nuclear option — it can recover money where individual proceedings cannot, but it freezes the project, triggers a resolution process, and is irreversible once admitted.

  • Forum: National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)
  • Typical timeline: months for admission, 270+ days for resolution
  • Remedy: corporate insolvency resolution — refund through resolution plan or liquidation
  • Best for: large-scale defaults where the builder is genuinely insolvent and individual proceedings have failed

How to choose

If the project is RERA-registered and the dispute is about delay or refund, file with RERA first — it is faster and the prescribed-rate interest is meaningful. If the claim includes substantial damages beyond refund, the consumer forum may be a better fit. If the builder is in evident financial distress and dozens of buyers are stuck, NCLT under Section 7 is the collective remedy. The forums are not mutually exclusive in every case, but pursuing parallel proceedings has consequences and is best done with legal advice.

SourceRERA Act, 2016 — Section 31 (Filing of complaints)

SourceInsolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 — Section 7